Palabras clave
propiedades psicométricas
baremo
estatus socioeconómico
consumo de sustancias
Cómo citar
Resumen
La escala de Consideración de las Consecuencias Futuras (CCF) evalúa el grado que las personas son influenciadas por las consecuencias inmediatas o distantes de sus comportamientos. En una muestra representativa de Montevideo, este estudio procuró explorar sus propiedades psicométricas, establecer sus baremos poblacionales, explorar su distribución territorial y evaluar las asociaciones de la CCF con el consumo de sustancias psico-activas. En este estudio, la solución de dos factores provee mejor ajuste, con adecuada confiabilidad. Las CCF presentan diferencias significativas según edad y sexo por lo que se ofrecen baremos específicos. Asimismo, encontramos evidencia mixta sobre su distribución territorial y un efecto pequeño sobre el consumo de algunas sustancias psicoactivas. Se discuten los resultados en función del rol de la CCF para explicar el comportamiento con consecuencias intertemporales.
Citas
Adams, J. (2012). Consideration of immediate and future consequences, smoking status, and body mass index. Health Psychology, 31(2), 260–263. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025790
Adams, J., & White, M. (2009). Time perspective in socioeconomic inequalities in smoking and body mass index. Health Psychology, 28(1), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.28.1.83
Alvarez-Nuñez, L. (2018). Confiabilidad y validez de la Escala Consideración de las Consecuencias Futuras en español Cómo pensamos en las consecuencias inmediatas (pero no las distantes) de nuestras acciones se asocia a un patrón conductual saludable. Tesis de maestría no publicada. Universidad de la República, Uruguay. https://www.colibri.udelar.edu.uy/jspui/bitstream/20.500.12008/20038/1/Alvarez%20Nu%C3%B1ez%2C%20Luc%C3%ADa.pdf
Balliet, D., & Ferris, D. L. (2013). Ostracism and prosocial behavior: A social dilemma perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(2), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.04.004
Beenstock, J., Adams, J., & White, M. (2011). The association between time perspective and alcohol consumption in university students: cross-sectional study. The European Journal of Public Health, 21(4), 438–443. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckp225
Byrne, B. (2013). Testing Change Over Time The Latent Growth Curve Model. In Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (pp. 313–344). New York: Routledge.
Camus, G., Berjot, S., & Ernst-Vintila, A. (2014). Validation française de l’échelle de prise en considération des conséquences futures de nos actes (CFC-14). Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 27(1), 35–63.
Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
Daugherty, J. R., & Brase, G. L. (2010). Taking time to be healthy: Predicting health behaviors with delay discounting and time perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, pp. 202–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.007
Haushofer, J., & Fehr, E. (2014). On the psychology of poverty. Science, 344(6186), 862–867. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232491
Instituto Nacional de Estadística. (2011). Resultados del Censo de Población 2011: población, crecimiento y estructura por sexo y edad.
Joireman, J., Balliet, D., Sprott, D., Spangenberg, E., & Schultz, J. (2008). Consideration of future consequences, ego-depletion, and self-control: Support for distinguishing between CFC-Immediate and CFC-Future sub-scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.02.011
Joireman, J., Becker, C., Barbosa-Leiker, C., & Duell, B. (2005). Aggression as a function of concern with future consequences and anticipated interaction with an aggressive peer. Poster presented at the 6th Annual Convention of the Society of Personality and Social Psychology Conference, New Orleans, LA. January 2005.
Joireman, J., & King, S. (2016). Individual Differences in the Consideration of Future and (More) Immediate Consequences: A Review and Directions for Future Research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(5), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12252
Joireman, J., Shaffer, M. J., Balliet, D., & Strathman, A. (2012). Promotion Orientation Explains Why Future-Oriented People Exercise and Eat Healthy: Evidence From the Two-Factor Consideration of Future Consequences-14 Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 1272–1287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212449362
Joireman, J., Strathman, A., & Balliet, D. (2006). Considering Future Consequences An Integrative Model. In E. Sanna, J. Lawrence, & E. Chang (Eds.), Judgments Over Time The Interplay of Thoughts, Feelings, and Behaviors (pp. 82–99). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195177664.003.0006
Lindsay, J. J., & Strathman, A. (1997). Predictors of Recycling Behavior: An Application of a Modified Health Belief Model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(20), 1799–1823. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01626.x
McKay, M. T., Cole, J. C., & Percy, A. (2015). Further evidence for a bifactor solution for the Consideration of Future Consequences Scale: Measurement and conceptual implications. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 219–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.022
McKay, M. T., Morgan, G. B., van Exel, N. J., & Worrell, F. C. (2015). Back to “the Future”: Evidence of a Bifactor Solution for Scores on the Consideration of Future Consequences Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97(4), 395–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2014.999338
McKay, M. T., Perry, J. L., Percy, A., & Cole, J. C. (2016). Evidence for the reliability and validity, but not the practical utility of the two-factor Consideration of Future Consequences Scale-14. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.097
Murphy, L., Cadogan, E., & Dockray, S. (2019). The Consideration of Future Consequences: Evidence for Domain Specificity Across Five Life Domains. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616721987347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219873478
Nigro, G., Cosenza, M., Ciccarelli, M., & Joireman, J. (2016). An Italian translation and validation of the Consideration of Future Consequences-14 Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 333–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.014
Pepper, G. V., & Nettle, D. (2017). The behavioural constellation of deprivation: Causes and consequences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40(July), e314. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1600234X
Percy, A., McKay, M. T., Perry, J. L., & Cole, J. C. (2018). Refining the clinical application of the consideration of future consequences scale -14. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9819-5
Ponce, J., & Tubbio, M. (2013). Precios de inmuebles: aproximaciones metodológicas y aplicación empírica. Documento de Trabajo Del Banco Central Del Uruguay.
Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 742–752. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742
Toepoel, V. (2010). Is consideration of future consequences a changeable construct? Personality and Individual Differences, 48(8), 951–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.029
Vásquez-Echeverría, A., Antino, M., Alvarez-Nuñez, L., & Rodríguez-Muñoz, A. (2018). Evidence for the reliability and factor solution of the CFCS-14 in Spanish: A multi-method validation in Spain and Uruguay. Personality and Individual Differences, 123, 171–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.021
Vásquez-Echeverría, A., Tomás, C., & Cruz, O. (2019). The development of episodic foresight in preschoolers: the role of socioeconomic status, parental future orientation, and family context. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 32(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-019-0125-4
Vásquez Echeverría, A., Martín, A., Ortuño, V., Esteves, C., & Joireman, J. (2017). Adaptación y validación inicial al castellano de la Escala Consideración de las Consecuencias Futuras. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación-e Avaliação Psicológica, 44(2), 5–15.
Viladrich, C., Angulo-Brunet, A., & Doval, E. (2017). Un viaje alrededor de alfa y omega para estimar la fiabilidad de consistencia interna. Anales de Psicología, 33(3), 755. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.33.3.268401
Zhang, Z., Kong, M., Zhang, L., & Li, Z. (2015). Consideration of future consequences: Preliminary evidences for a four-factor distinction. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.022
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2020 Lucía Stephanie Alvarez-Nuñez, Alejandro Vásquez Echeverría, Hugo Selma