Abstract
One of the greatest challenges in the study of environmental values is the understanding of the dynamic relationships between different beliefs and attitudes capable of constituting a network of influence on consumption behavior, among them the disposition to material sacrifice. For the present study, 391 Brazilian participants, with a mean age of M = 35.39 (SD = 12.5), 148 (37.9%) males, and 243 (62.1%) females, responded to the Material Sacrifice Scale, Relatedness to Nature Scale, Frugality Scale, Self-Reported Altruism Scale and a sociodemographic questionnaire. Bivariate analyzes indicate that material sacrifice has positive correlations with the dimensions of all the measures employed, including frugality and altruism. In the multivariate model, it was observed that environmental values serve as mediators of the impact of frugality and altruism on material sacrifice, with the final model reaching satisfactory adjustment for the complexity of its structure, which includes a complete metric model.
References
Akehurst, G., Afonso, C., & Martins Gonçalves, H. (2012). Re-examining green purchase behaviour and the green consumer profile: new evidences. Management Decision, 50(5), 972-988. http://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211227726
Brown, T. A. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Publications.
Corral-Verdugo, V., Mireles-Acosta, J. F., Tapia-Fonllem, C., & Fraijo-Sing, B. (2011). Happiness as correlate of sustainable behavior: A study of pro-ecological, frugal, equitable and altruistic actions that promote subjective wellbeing. Human Ecology Review, 95-104. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24707465?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
De Groot, J. I., & Steg, L. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40(3), 330-354. http://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506297831
De Groot, J. I., & Steg, L. (2009). Morality and prosocial behavior: The role of awareness, responsibility, and norms in the norm activation model. The Journal of social psychology, 149(4), 425-449. http://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.149.4.425-449
Dahl, R. (2010). Green Washing: Do you know what you’re buying?. Environmental health perspectives, 118(6), A246. http://doi.org/10.1289/ehp118-a246
Evans, D. (2011). Thrifty, green or frugal: Reflections on sustainable consumption in a changing economic climate. Geoforum, 42(5), 550-557. Http://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.03.008
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 98(3), 392. Retrieved from: http://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2010-02829-004
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R. and Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
Hartmann, P., & Apaolaza-Ibáñez, V. (2012). Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward green energy brands: The roles of psychological benefits and environmental concern. Journal of Business Research, 65(9), 1254-1263. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.11.001
Howell, R. A. (2013). It’s not (just) “the environment, stupid!” Values, motivations, and routes to engagement of people adopting lower-carbon lifestyles. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 281–290. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.015
Huang, Y.-C., & Liu, C.-H. S. (2017). Moderating and mediating roles of environmental concern and ecotourism experience for revisit intention. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(7), 1854–1872. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-12-2015-0677
Lastovicka, J. L., Bettencourt, L. A., Hughner, R. S., & Kuntze, R. J. (1999). Lifestyle of the tight and frugal: Theory and measurement. Journal of consumer research, 26(1), 85-98. http://doi.org/10.1086/209552
Markowitz, E. M., Goldberg, L. R., Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2012). Profiling the “Pro-Environmental Individual”: A Personality Perspective: Personality and Pro-Environmental Action. Journal of Personality, 80(1), 81–111. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00721.x
Mazar, N., & Zhong, C. B. (2010). Do green products make us better people?. Psychological science, 21(4), 494-498. Http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610363538
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2018). Mplus User's Guide. Sixth Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715-740. http://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508318748
Peattie, K. (2010). Green consumption: behavior and norms. Annual review of environment and resources, 35. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-032609-094328
Pepper, M., Jackson, T., & Uzzell, D. (2009). An examination of the values that motivate socially conscious and frugal consumer behaviours. International journal of consumer studies, 33(2), 126-136. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00753.x
Pires, P., de Castro Ribas Junior, R., Campos Lopes Lemos, D., & Filgueiras, A. (2014). Ecocentrismo e comportamento: revisão da literatura em valores ambientais. Psicologia em Estudo, 19(4). http://doi.org/10.1590/1413-73722201204
Rao, B. C. (2013). How disruptive is frugal?. Technology in Society, 35(1), 65-73. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.03.003
Rushton, J. P., Chrisjohn, R. D., & Fekken, G. C. (1981). The altruistic personality and the self-report altruism scale. Personality and individual differences, 2(4), 293-302. Retrieved from: http://philipperushton.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/personality-prosocial-rushton-personality-individual-differences-1981.pdf
Turaga, R. M. R., Howarth, R. B., & Borsuk, M. E. (2010). Pro-environmental behavior: Rational choice meets moral motivation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1185(1), 211–224. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05163.x
Verplanken, B., Walker, I., Davis, A., & Jurasek, M. (2008). Context change and travel mode choice: Combining the habit discontinuity and self-activation hypotheses. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(2), 121-127. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.005
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2020 Pedro P. Pires, Julia Mulinari Peixoto, Rodolfo de Castro Ribas Jr., Marcos Aguiar de Souza