Resumo
The social support has been reported as playing an important role in the older people life due to its protection effect for health in this specific people. This paper aims to identify psychosocial predictors for perceived social support in Brazilian older people. The sample is constituted by 144 patients (M age=69.3; SD=6.61). The data were collected through a questionnaire that included sociodemographic questions and scales for psychological variables (e.g. self-efficacy) studied. Lower age, higher level of education, being married or living in a stable union, low levels or absence of depression and high levels of self-efficacy are significant predictors of perceived social support in older people who were studied. Future interventions in older people health promotion context may consider these determinants.
Referências
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Bardi, S., Lorenzoni, G., & Gregori, D. (2016). Social support to elderly pacemaker patients improves device acceptance and quality of life. European Geriatric Medicine, article in press. doi: 10.1016/j.eurger.2016.02.001
Barrett, A.E. (1999). Social support and life satisfaction among the never married. Research on Aging, 21(1), 46-72. doi: 10.1177/0164027599211003
Bowling, A. (2011). Do older and younger people differ in their reported well-being? A national survey of adults in Britain. Family Practice, 28(2), 145–155. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmq082
Brito, T.R.P., & Pavarini, S.C. (2012). The relationship between social support and functional capacity in elderly persons with cognitive alterations. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem, 20(4), 1-8. doi:org/10.1590/S0104-11692012000400007
Carstensen, L. L. (1987). Age-related changes in social activity. In L. L. Carstensen & B. A. Edelstein (Eds.), Handbook of clinical gerontology (pp. 222–237). Elmsford: Pergamon Press
Carstensen, L. L. (1992). Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 7, 331–338. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.7.3.331
Cutrona, C.E., & Russell, D.W. (1987). The provisions of social relationships and adaptation to stress. Advances in Personal Relationships, 1, 37-67.
Drame, M., Mahmoudi, R., Jolly, D., Rapin, A., Morrone, I., Boyer, F.C., … Novella, J.L. (2013). Social support and six-month outcome among elderly patients hospitalised via emergency department: the SAFES Cohort study. European Geriatric Medicine, 4(3), 161–166. doi:10.1016/j.eurger.2013.01.007
Feng, Z., Jones, K., & Wang, W.W. (2015). An exploratory discrete-time multilevelanalysis of the effect of social support on the survival of elderly people in China. Social Science & Medicine, 130, 181-189. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.02.020
Karademas, E. C. (2006). Self-efficacy, social support and well-being. The mediating role of optimism. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(6), 1281-1290. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.019
Kuhirunyaratn, P., Pongpanich, S., Somrongthong, S., Love, E.J., and & Sedgwick, & Chapman, R.S. (2007). Social support among elderly in Khon Kean province, Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health, 38(5), 936-946.
Lyyra, T.M., & Heikkinen, R.L. (2006). Perceived social support and mortality in older people. Journal of Gerontology: SOCIAL SCIENCES, 61(3), 147-152.
Melchiorre, M.G., Chiatti, C., Lamura1, G., Torres-Gonzales, F., Stankunas, M., Lindert, J., … Soares, J.F.J. (2013). Social support, socio-economic status, health and abuse among older people in seven European countries. PLOS One, 8(1), e54856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054856
Mitchell, R.E., Trickett, E.J. (1980). Task force report: social networks as mediators of social support: an analysis of the effects and determinants of social networks. Commun Ment Health J, 16(1), 27–44.
Olagunju A.T., Olutoki M.O., Ogunnubi O.P., & Adeyemi, J.D. (2015). Late-life depression: burden, severity and relationship with social support dimensions in a West African community. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 61, 240–246. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2015.05.002
Radloff, L.S. (1977). The CES-D scale - a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385-401. doi: 10.1177/014662167700100306
Ricks, J.M. (1984). Radio, social support, and mental health. Can Ment Health, 32(4), 13-15.
Sbicigo, J.B., Teixeira, M.A.P., Dias, A.C.G., & Dell`Aglio, D.D. (2012). Psychometric properties of the general perceived self-efficacy scale (EAGP). PSICO, 43(2), 139-146.
Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1993). General perceived self-efficacy. Retrieved from http://userpage.fuberlin.de/~gesund/skalen/Language_Selection/Turkish/General_Perceived_SelfEfficac/hauptteil_general_perceived_self-efficac.htm.
Segrin, C. (2003). Age moderates the relationship between social support and psychosocial problems. Human Communication Research, 29(3), 317–342. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2003.tb00842.x
Silveira, D.X., & Jorge, M.R. (1998). Psychometric properties of the epidemiologic screening scale for depression (CES-D) in clinical and non-clinical populations of adolescents and young adults. Arch. clin. Psychiatry, 25(5), 251-261.
Unalan, D., Gocer, S., Basturk, M., Baydur, H., & Ozturk, A. (2015). Coincidence of low social support and high depressive score on quality of life in elderly. European Geriatric Medicine, 6(4), 319–324. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurger.2015.02.009
Wang, C.M., Qu, H.I., & Xu, H.M. (2016). Relationship between social support and self-efficacy in women psychiatrists. Chinese Nursing Research, article in press. doi:10.1016/j.cnre.2015.10.002
Warner, L.M., Ziegelmann, J.P., Schüz, B., Wurm, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2011). Synergistic Effect of Social Support and Self-Efficacy on Physical Exercise in Older Adults. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 19(3), 249-261.
White, A.M., Philogene, G.S., Fine, L., Sarbajit, S. (2009). Social support and self-reported health status of older adults in the United States. Am J Public Health, 99, 1872-1878. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.146894
Yeh, S.C.J., & Liu, Y.Y. (2003). Influence of social support on cognitive function in the elderly. BMC Health Serv Res, 3(9), 1-9. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-3-9
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).