Keywords
quality assessment
social representations
structural approach
How to Cite
Abstract
A few taxonomies have been proposed to categorize the cues consumers use to assess the quality of a given product. However, these taxonomies do not take into account the possible hierarchy that may exist among these cues. Through three studies we tested a taxonomy based on the structural approach to social representations. This framework proposes a distinction between central and peripheral cues. The former would be essential whereas the latter would be less important in the process of conducting quality assessment or with regard to purchase intentions. Results show that, concerning purchase intentions, a good central feature can compensate for a poor peripheral feature while the converse is not possible. Moreover, this interaction effect is mediated by the perceived quality of the product.
References
Abric, J.-C. (2001). A structural approach to social representations. In K. Deaux & G. Philogène (Eds.), Representations of the social: bridging theoretical traditions (pp. 42-47). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting behaviour. Engelwood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Batt, P. J., & Dean, A. (2000). Factors influencing the consumer's decision. Australian & New Zealand Wine Industry Journal, 15(4), 534-41.
Bettman, J. R., & Park, C. W. (1980). Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: A protocol analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), 234-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/208812
Bordarie, J. (2019). Social representations and social marketing: Effectiveness of awareness campaigns on the representation of public policies?. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 24(2), e1633. http://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1633
Cordell, V. V. (1992). Effects of consumer preferences for foreign sourced products. Journal of International Business Studies, 23, 251-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490267
Dany, L., Urdapilleta, I., & Lo Monaco, G. (2015). Free associations and social representations: some reflections on rank-frequency and importance-frequency methods. Quality & Quantity, 49(2), 489-507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0005-z
Dawar, N., & Parker, P. (1994). Marketing universals: consumer use of brand name, price, physical appearance, and retailer reputation, as signals of product quality. Journal of Marketing Research, 58, 81-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1252271
Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 307-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3172866
Doise, W., Clémence, A., & Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1993). The Quantitative analysis of social representations. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Er‐rafiy, A., & Brauer, M. (2012). Increasing perceived variability reduces prejudice and discrimination: Theory and application. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(12), 920- http://dx.doi.org/935. 10.1111/spc3.12000
Erdem, T., & Swait, J. (1998). Brand equity as a signaling phenomenon. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7, 131-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0702_02
Ernst-Vintila, A., Delouvée, S., & Roland-Lévy, C. (2011). Under threat. Lay thinking about terrorism and the three dimensional model of personal involvement: a social psychological analysis. Journal of Risk Research, 13, 297–325. http://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.533468
Galli, I., Fasanelli, R., & Schember, E. (2017). Iconographical stimuli as a creative approach for social representations. International E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences, 3(8), 473-478. http://doi.org/10.18769/ijasos.336979
Germann, R., Kurth, L., & Matthiesen, S. (2020). Disruptive factors in the evaluation of perceived quality aspects–consideration of the brand influence. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 76, 102931. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2020.102931
Gunasti, K., & Ross, W. T. (2009). How inferences about missing attributes decrease the tendency to defer choice and increase purchase probability. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(5), 823-837. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/593684
Ju, B., & Gluck, M. (2011). Calibrating information users’ views on relevance: A social representations approach. Journal of Information Science, 37(4), 429-438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165551511412030
Ju, B., & O’Connor, D. O. (2013). Beyond Categories: A Structural Analysis of the Social Representations of Information Users’ Collective Perceptions on ‘Relevance’. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 1(2), 16-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2013.1.2.2
Jung, Y., & Pawlowski, S. (2015). The meaning of virtual entrepreneurship in social virtual worlds. Telematics and Informatics, 32(1), 193-203.
Jung, Y., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2014). Understanding consumption in social virtual worlds: A sensemaking perspective on the consumption of virtual goods. Journal of Business Research, 67(10), 2231-2238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.01.002
Jung, Y., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2014). Understanding consumption in social virtual worlds: A sensemaking perspective on the consumption of virtual goods. Journal of Business Research, 67(10), 2231-2238.
Kamiejski, R., Guimond, S., De Oliveira, P., Er-Rafiy, A., & Brauer, M. (2012). Le modèle républicain d'intégration : implications pour la psychologie des relations entre groupes [The republican model of integration: implications for the psychology of intergroups relations]. L’Année Psychologique, 112, 51-85.
Kanji, G. K. (2006). 100 statistical tests. London: Sage.
Katerelos, I. D. (2003). Négociabilité argumentative intra-noyau: une etude exploratoire sur la structure des représentations sociales [Intra-core argumentative negotiability: an exploratory study on the structure of social representations]. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 60, 40-49.
Kirmani, A. (1997). Advertising repetition as a signal of quality: If it's advertised so much, something must be wrong. Journal of Advertising, 26(3), 77-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1997.10673530
Lebrun, A. M. (2014). Representations of a destination city break. Analysis based on free associations. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 31, 195–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2014.873312
Lebrun, A. M., Souchet, L., & Bouchet, P. (2013). Social representations and brand positioning in the sporting goods market. European Sport Management Quarterly, 13(3), 358-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2013.787539
Lo Monaco, G., Delouvée, S., & Rateau, P. (2016). Les représentations sociales. Théories, méthodes et applications [Social representations. Theories, methods and applications]. Bruxelles : de Boeck.
Lo Monaco, G., Lheureux, F., & Halimi-Falkowicz, S. (2008). Le Test d’Indépendance au Contexte (TIC): une nouvelle technique d’étude de la structure représentationnelle [Test of Context Independence (TCI) and Structure of Social Representations]. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 67, 119-123.
Lo Monaco, G., Piermattéo, A., Guimelli, C., & Abric, J.-C. (2012). Questionnaire of characterization and correspondence factor analysis: a methodological contribution in the field of social representations. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(3), 1233-1243. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n3.39410
Lo Monaco, G., Piermattéo, A., Rateau, P., & Tavani, J. L. (2017). Methods for studying the structure of social representations: a critical review and agenda for future research. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 47(3), 306-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12124
Löbbers, J., Lins, S., Kromat, T., Benlian, A., & Sunyaev, A. (2020). A multi-perspective lens on web assurance seals: contrasting vendors’ intended and consumers’ perceived effects. Electronic Commerce Research, 1-43. http://doi.org/0.1007/s10660-020-09415-2
Lynch, J. G., & Srull, T. K. (1982). Memory and attentional factors in consumer choice: Concepts and research methods. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 18-37. http://doi.org/10.1086/208893
Mäkiniemi, J.-P., Pirttilä-Backman, A.-M., & Pieri, M. (2011). Ethical and unethical food. Social representations among Finnish, Danish and Italian students. Appetite, 56, 495–502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.01.023
Michaut, C., & Roche, M. (2017). L’influence des usages numériques des étudiants sur la réussite universitaire [The influence of students' digital uses on academic success]. Revue internationale de pédagogie de l’enseignement supérieur, 33(1).
Michel, G. (1999). L'évolution des marques: approche par la théorie du noyau central [The evolution of brands through the theory of the central core]. Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 14(4), 32-53.
Michel, G., & Donthu, N. (2014). Why negative brand extension evaluations do not always negatively affect the brand: The role of central and peripheral brand associations. Journal of Business Research, 67(12), 2611-2619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.03.020
Moliner, P. (2002). Ambiguous scenario and attribute challenge techniques. Social representations of the firm and the nurse. European Review of Applied Psychology, 52, 273-279.
Moliner, P. (2016). From Central Core Theory to Matrix Nucleus Theory. Papers on social representations, 25(2), 3-1.
Moliner, P., & Abric J.-C. (2015). Central Core theory. In G. Sammut, E. Andreouli, G. Gaskell & J. Valsiner (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations (pp. 83-95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moscovici, S. (2008). Psychoanalysis, its image and its public. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 852-863. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852
Narwal, P., & Nayak, J. K. (2020). How consumers form product quality perceptions in absence of fixed posted prices: Interaction of product cues with seller reputation and third-party reviews. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 101924.
Pawlowski, S. D., & Jung, Y. (2019). Social representations of cybersecurity by university students and implications for instructional design. Journal of Information Systems Education, 26(4), 3.
Pawlowski, S. D., Kaganer, E. A., & Cater III, J. J. (2007). Focusing the research agenda on burnout in IT: social representations of burnout in the profession. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(5), 612-627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000699
Piermattéo, A., Lo Monaco, G., & Girandola, F. (2016). When commitment can be overturned: Anticipating recycling program dropouts through social representations. Environment and Behavior, 48(10), 1270-1291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916515597511
Pozzi, M., Fattori, F., Bocchiaro, P., & Alfieri, S. (2014). Do the right thing! A study on social representation of obedience and disobedience. New Ideas in Psychology, 35, 18–27. http://dx.doi.org/j.newideapsych.2014.06.002
Purohit, D., & Srivastava, J. (2001). Effect of manufacturer reputation, retailer reputation, and product warranty on consumer judgments of product quality: A cue diagnosticity framework. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10(3), 123-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1003_1
Rao, A. R., & Monroe, K. B. (1988). The moderating effect of prior knowledge on cue utilization in product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 253-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209162
Rateau, P., Moliner, P., Guimelli, C. & Abric, J.-C. (2011). Social representation theory. In P. A. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 477-497). London: Sage.
Rochira, A., Salvatore, S., Veltri, G. A., Redd, R. R., & Lancia, F. (2020). Theory and Method for the Analysis of Social Representations. In T. Mannarini, G. Veltri, & S. Salvatore (Eds.), Media and Social Representations of Otherness (pp. 17-38). Cham: Springer.
Roininen, K., Arvola, A., & Lähteenmäki, L. (2006). Exploring consumers’ perceptions of local food with two different qualitative techniques: Laddering and word association. Food quality and preference, 17(1), 20-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.04.012
Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., & Valsiner, J. (2015). The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sinrungtam, W. (2013). Impact of country of origin dimensions on purchase intention of eco car. International Journal of Business and Management, 8, 51-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v8n11p51
Skandrani-Marzouki, I., Lo Monaco, G., & Marzouki, Y. (2015). The effects of unconscious context on social representations: Evidence from the subliminal emotional priming paradigm. North American Journal of Psychology, 17(3), 509-524.
Sullivan, Y. W., & Kim, D. J. (2018). Assessing the effects of consumers’ product evaluations and trust on repurchase intention in e-commerce environments. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 199-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.008
Tafani, E., Haguel, V., & Menager, A. (2007). Des images de marque aux représentations sociales des marques: une application au secteur de l’automobile [From brand image to social representations of brands: an application in the automobile sector]. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 73, 27-46.
Wagner, W., Valencia, J., & Elejabarrieta, F. (1996). Relevance, discourse and the ‘hot’stable core social representations-A structural analysis of word associations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35(3), 331-351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01101.x
Wolter, R. (2018). The structural approach to social representations: Bridges between theory and methods. Psico-USF, 23(4), 621-631. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712018230403
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2020 Anthony Piermattéo, Grégory Lo Monaco, Sylvain Delouvée