Five decades of the Interamerican Journal of Psychology. A socio-bibliometric study

Fernando Polanco, Josiane Sueli Beria, Hugo Klappenbach

Abstract


The Inter-American Journal of Psychology (RIP) is the scientific publication of the Inter-American Psychological Society and one of the most influential and well established journals in the Americas. We realized a socio-bibliometric analysis based on the first 50 volumes of the publication (1967-2016). This methodology is part of the ex post facto studies pertaining to the history of psychology. It was observed that the general structure of the RIP was characterized by the diversity and frequent changes of its staff and its advisory and scientific boards. Considering the language, it is highlighted that papers were published in Spanish, English and Portuguese. The three most productive authors were R. Ardila, R. Díaz-Loving, and L. F. Natalicio. The analysis of citations showed the great concentration of references to North-American papers and books; publications devoted to locus of control, social learning and transcultural, social and community psychology the most frequently referenced. The conceptual analysis showed that the roots of the production of the RIP sink into the concepts of behavior and cognition, analyzed from experimental and psychometric methods mainly based on North-American social psychology. Childhood is the main population analyzed, and the applied fields preferred were clinical, social, cultural and educational. In conclusion, it is observed that the intellectual origin reflected in the RIP is strongly biased by the general features of the North-American psychology, with emphasis on experimental, differential, social and applied psychology.

Keywords


Bibliometrics; Publications; History; Psychology

References


Borges, V. (2004). Los 38 años de Historia de la Revista Interamericana de Psicología. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 38 (2), 369-372.

Brozek, J. (1991). Quantifying history of psychology: bibliometry alla Valenciana. Revista de Historia de la Psicología, 12 (2), 15-36.

Callón, M., Courtial, J. P. y Penan, H. (1995). Cienciometría. Guijón: Tea

Carpintero, H. y Peiró, J. (Eds.). (1981). Psicología Contemporánea: Teoría y métodos cuantitativos para el estudio de su literatura científica. Valencia: Alfaplus.

Cobo-Martín, M. J. (2011). SciMAT: Herramienta Software para el Análisis de la Evolución del Conocimiento Científico. Propuesta de una Metodología. Memoria de Tesis Doctoral. Granada: Universidad de Granada.

Klappenbach, H. (2009). Estudio bibliométrico de la Revista de Psicología de la Universidad Nacional de La Plata. 1964-1983. Revista de Psicología, 2ª época, 10, 13-65.

Polanco, F. (2016). “Impacto y evolución del conductismo en la Revista Interamericana de Psicología y la Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología. Un análisis sociobibliométrico (1969-2008)”. Tesis de doctorado. San Luis: Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de San Luis.

Serrano-García, I. y Resto-Olivo, J. (2003). La Revista Interamericana de Psicología: Debut y Despedida. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 37 (1), 13-29.

UNESCO (2000). Declaración sobre la ciencia y el uso del saber científico. En UNESCO, La Ciencia para el Siglo XXI un nuevo compromiso. Conferencia Mundial sobre la Ciencia (pp. 7-17). Paris: UNESCO.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30849/rip/ijp.v51i3.910

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Fernando Polanco, Josiane Sueli Beria, Hugo Klappenbach

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.