Expected and unexpected effects of sexism on women’s mathematics performance

  • Vanessa Smith-Castro Universidad de Costa Rica http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6348-4223
  • Eiliana Montero-Rojas Universidad de Costa Rica
  • Tania Elena Moreira-Mora Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica
  • José Andrey Zamora-Araya Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica
Keywords: Sexism, Stereotypes, Math Self-efficacy, Standardized Math Tests

Abstract

Research has shown that gender differences in Math performance are partially predicted by sociocultural aspects such as sexist ideologies and stereotypes. This study examined sexist ideologies as predictors of women´s achievement in standardized Math tests, and the mediation role of Math-gender stereotypes and Math self- efficacy, while controlling for abstract reasoning, among high-school girls (H.S.), and university women majoring Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH), and in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM). Among H.S. girls, data showed the expected indirect effect of Math gender stereotypes on Math achievement via Math self-efficacy. Among university students, model adjustment was less optimal. An unexpected positive relationship between hostile sexism and Math performance in STEM fields emerged. Out data suggest several mechanisms by which ideologies and gender stereotypes affect women´s Math performance.

Author Biographies

Vanessa Smith-Castro, Universidad de Costa Rica
Instittuo de Investigaciones Psicológicas. Escuela de Psicología. Universidad de Costa Rica
Eiliana Montero-Rojas, Universidad de Costa Rica

Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas. Escuela de Estadística. Universidad de Costa Rica

Tania Elena Moreira-Mora, Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica
Departamento de Orientación y Psicología. Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica
José Andrey Zamora-Araya, Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica
Escuela de Matemática. Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica

References

Beyer, S. & Bowden, E. (1997). Gender Differences in Self-Perceptions: Convergent Evidence from Three Measures of Accuracy and Bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 157-172.

Bian, L., Leslie, S. J., & Cimpian, A. (2017). Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children's interests. Science, 355(6323), 389–391.

Brown, C. S., & Leaper, C. (2010). Latina and European American girls' experiences with academic sexism and their self-concepts in mathematics and science during adolescence. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 63, 860-870.

Cattell, R.B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 1-22.

Cliff, A. y Montero, E. (2010). El Balance entre Excelencia y Equidad en Pruebas de Admisión: Contribuciones de Experiencias en Sudáfrica y Costa Rica [The balance between excellence and equity in admission tests: Contributions from South Africa and Costa Rica]. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 3 (2), 7-28.

Correll, S.J., (2001). Gender and the career choice process: the role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology 106 (6), 1691-1730.

Dardenne, B., Dumont, M., & Bollier, T. (2007). Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: Consequences for women’s performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 764–779.

Eccles, J. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: Freeman.

Ellis J, Fosdick BK, Rasmussen C (2016) Women 1.5 Times More Likely to Leave STEM Pipeline after Calculus Compared to Men: Lack of Mathematical Confidence a Potential Culprit. PLoS ONE 11(7): e0157447. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0157447

Expósito, F., Moya, M., & Glick, P. (1998). Sexismo ambivalente: medición y correlatos [Ambivalent sexism: measurement and correlates]. Revista de Psicología Social, 13, 159-169.

Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. (1976). Fennema-Sherman Mathematics Attitudes Scales: Instruments Designed to Measure Attitudes toward the Learning of Mathematics by Females and Males. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7(5), 324-326. doi:10.2307/748467.

Fiske. S.T.. & North. M.S. (2014). Measures of stereotyping and prejudice: Barometers of bias. In G. Boyle & D. Saklofske (Eds.). Measures of Personality & Social Psychological Constructs (pp. 684-718). Elsevier/Academic Press.

Forgasz, H.J., Leder, G.C. & Gardner, P.L. (1999). The Fennema-Sherman Mathematics as a Male Domain Scale Reexamined.

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30 (3), 342-348.

Glick. P. & Fiske. S.T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 70. 491-512.

Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. (2011). Ambivalent sexism revisited. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(3), 530–535. doi:10.1177/0361684311414832

Good, C., Aronson, J., & Harder, J. A. (2008). Problems in the pipeline: Stereotype threat and women’s achievement in high-level math courses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 17-28.

Guiso L, Monte F, Sapienza P, & Zingales L. (2008). Culture, gender and Math. Science, 320, 1164–1165.

Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. American Association of University Women. 1111 Sixteenth Street NW, Washington, DC 20036.

Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.

Hyde J.S, Fennema E., Ryan, M., Frost, L.A., Hopp, C. (1990). Gender comparisons of mathematics attitudes and affect: A meta-analysis. Psychol Women Quart. 1990, 14, 299–324.

Hughes, R.M. (2011). Are the predictors of women’s persistence in STEM painting the full picture? A series of comparative case studies. Int. J. of Gender, Science and Technology, 3 (3), 547-570.

Jacobs, J. E., & Eccles, J. S., (1992). The impact of mothers’ gender-role stereotypic beliefs on mothers’ and children’s ability perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 932–944.

Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996a). PRELIS: User’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.

Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996b). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International Inc.

Little, T. D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K., & Schoemann, A. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18, 285-300.

Mena, P. (2015). Desarrollo en la prueba nacional de bachillerato de Matemática: una necesidad [Development of the National High-schools Exit Test in Mathematics]. Cuadernos de Investigación y Formación en Educación Matemática, 10 (13), 53-66.

Montero, E.; Castelain, T.; Moreira, T.; Alfaro, L.; Cerdas, D.; García A.; Roldán, G. (2013). Evidencias iniciales de validez de criterio de los resultados de una Prueba de razonamiento con figuras para la selección de estudiantes indígenas para la Universidad de Costa Rica y el Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica [Initial criterion validity of the Test of Reasoning with Figures for the selection of Indigenous People at the University of Costa Rica and the Costa Rica Technological Institute]. Revista Educación 37(2), 103-117.

Moya. M.. Morales. E.. & Expósito. F. (2001). Nuevas formas. viejos intereses: Neosexismo en varones españoles [New forms. old interests: Neosexism among Spanish men]. Psicothema. 13 (4). 643-649.

Nguyen, H.-H. D., & Ryan, A. M. (2008). Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1314-1334.

Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., Bar-Anan, Y., Bergh, B., Cai, H., Gonsalkorale, K., Kesebir, S., Maliszewski, N., Neto, F., Olli, E., Park, J., Schnabel, K., Shiomura, K., Tulbure, B. T., Wiers, R., Somogyi, M., Akrami, N., Ekehammar, B., Vianello, M., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2009). National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 10593-10597.

Ong, M., (2005). Body Projects of Young Women of Color in Physics: Intersections of Gender, Race, and Science. Social Problems, 52, 593-617.

Owens, K. (2007/2008). Identity as a mathematical thinker. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 9, 36-50.

Programa Estado de la Nación. (2015). Quinto Informe Estado de la Educación en Costa Rica. [Fifth informof the state of the Education in Costa Rica]. San José: Programa Estado de la Nación.

Schmader T, Johns M, Barquissau M. (2004). The costs of accepting gender differences: The role of stereotype endorsement in women's experience in the math domain. Sex Roles, 50, 835–850.

Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 81–84.

Smith-Castro, V. (comp.) (2014). Compendio de Instrumentos de Medición IIP-2014 [IIP Measurment Instruments Compendium 2014]. Serie Cuadernos Metodológicos. San José, CR: Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas.

Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1373

Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629.

Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797.

Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 379–440). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Walton G. M., & Spencer S. J. (2009). Latent ability: Grades and test scores systematically underestimate the intellectual ability of negatively stereotyped students. Psychological Science, 20, 1132–1139 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02417.x

Zell, E., Strickhouser, J. E., Lane, T. N., & Teeter, S. R. (2016). Mars, Venus, or Earth? Sexism and the exaggeration of psychological gender differences. Sex Roles, 75, 287-300.

Published
2019-08-17
How to Cite
Smith-Castro, V., Montero-Rojas, E., Moreira-Mora, T. E., & Zamora-Araya, J. A. (2019). Expected and unexpected effects of sexism on women’s mathematics performance. Revista Interamericana De Psicologia/Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 53(1), 28-44. https://doi.org/10.30849/rip/ijp.v53i1.905