Is it human mind attuned with general ecological principles?

Victor Corral-Verdugo, Fernanda Inez García-Vazquez, Blanca Fraijo-Sing, Cesar Tapia-Fonllem


Some scholars claim that similarities exist between human communities and ecosystems; also, that people can learn how to live sustainably from knowing the way ecosystems work. Yet, at the psychological level, the relationship between practicing sustainable behaviors and living in accordance with ecological principles has been barely studied. This paper addresses such relationship, testing the idea that acting in accordance with ecological principles requires 1) a knowledge of ecological rules, 2) an affinity towards those rules, and 3) behaving accordingly (i.e., acting sustainably). We call this hypothetical construct the Human Attunement with Ecological Principles (HAEP), assuming that it implies the presence of a human predisposition to knowing, valuing and applying these principles. In developing the idea, the paper reviews relevant literature, aiming to find evidence that supports the HAEP hypothesis, and presents results of a study showing that HAEP significantly and saliently predicts engagement in sustainable behaviors.


Ecological principles, human attunement, sustainable behavior, sustainability

Full Text:



Bamberg, S., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2003). Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: The roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 175–187.

Barr, S., Gilg, A., & Ford, N. (2005). Defining the multi-dimensional aspects of household waste management: A study of reported behavior in Devon. Resources Conservation & Recycling, 45, 172-192.

Bentler, P.M. (2006). EQS, Structural Equations Program Manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software Inc.

Cafferatta, N. A. (2004). Introducción al derecho ambiental [Introduction to Environmental Law]. Mexico City: Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales.

Capra, F. (2005). Speaking Nature's Language: Principles for Sustainability. In M. K. Stone, & Z. Barlow (Eds.), Ecological Literacy: Educating our Children for a Sustainable World. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.

Capra, F., & Pauli, G. A. (1995). Steering business toward sustainability. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

Corral-Verdugo, V. (2010). Psicología de la Sustentabilidad [Psychology of Sustainability]. Mexico City: Trillas.

Corral-Verdugo, V., Bonnes, M., Tapia, C., Fraijo, B., Frías, M. & Carrus, G. (2009). Correlates of pro-sustainability orientation: The affinity towards diversity. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 29, 34-43.

Corral-Verdugo, V., Carrus, G., Bonnes, M., Moser, G. & Sinha, J. (2008). Environmental beliefs and endorsement of Sustainable Development principles in water conservation: towards a New Human Interdependence Paradigm scale. Environment & Behavior, 40, 703-725.

Corral-Verdugo, V., Tapia, C., Fraijo, B., Mireles, J. & Márquez, P. (2008). Orientación a la sustentabilidad como determinante de los estilos de vida sustentables: Un estudio con una muestra mexicana [Pro-sustainability orientation as determinant of sustainable lifestyles]. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 25, 313-327.

Costa, I. (2000). Principios ecológicos y calidad de vida [Ecological principles and quality of life]. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 8, 1-5.

Dimauro, G., & De Manuel, E. (2010). Comunidades en transición: Hacia otras prácticas

sostenibles en los ecosistemas urbanos [Communities in transition: towards alternative sustainable practices in urban ecosystems]. Revista Cidades, Comunidades e Territórios, 20, 1-21.

Edgerton, E., Mckechnie, J. & Dunleavy, K. (2009). Behavioral determinants of household participation in a household composting scheme. Environment & Behavior, 41, 151-169.

Fraijo, B., Corral-Verdugo, V., Tapia, C. & González, D. (2010). Promoting pro-environmental competency. In V. Corral-Verdugo, C. García, & M.

Frías (Eds.), Psychological Approaches to Sustainability. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

Frick, J., Kaiser, F.G. & Wilson, M. (2004). Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior: Exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1597-1613.

Fridja, N. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Gosling, E. & Williams, K. (2010). Connectedness to nature, place attachment and conservation behaviour: Testing connectedness theory among farmers. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 298-304.

Hernández, B., Suárez, E., Corral-Verdugo, V., & Hess, S. (2012). The relationship between social and environmental interdependence as an explanation of proenvironmental behavior. Human Ecology Review, 19, 1-9.

Hinds, J. & Sparks, P. (2008). Engaging with the natural environment: the role of affective connection and identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 109-120.

Hines, J.M., Hungerford, H.R. & Tomera, A.N. (1986). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 18, 1-18.

International Union for Conservation of Nature – IUCN. (2010). About biodiversity. Retrieved from:

Kaiser, F. (1998). A general measure of ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 395-422.

Kramer, F. (2003). Environmental Education for Sustainable Development. Madrid: Books of the Cataract.

Laurian, L. (2003). A prerequisite for participation. Environmental knowledge and what residents know about local toxic sites. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22, 257-269.

Loewenstein, G., & Lerner, J. (2003). The role of affect in decision making. En R. Davidson, K. Scherer & H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of Affective Sciences. New York: Oxford University Press.

Mayer, S. F., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale a measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24:505–515.

Meinhold, J. & Malkus, A. (2005). Adolescent environmental behaviors. Can knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy make a difference? Environment & Behavior, 37, 511-532.

Nelson, G. B., & Prilleltensky, I. (2005). Community psychology: In pursuit of liberation and well-being. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Ojeda, S., Armijo, C., & Ramírez, M.E. (2003). Characterization and quantification of household solid wastes in a Mexican city. Resources Conservation & Recycling, 39, 211-222.

Orr, D.W. (1992) Ecological Literacy: education and the transition to a postmodern world. Albany, State University of New York Press.

Pomier, P. (2002). Determinismo biológico: el desafío de la alfabetización ecológica en la concepción de Fritjof Capra [Biological determinism: the challenge of ecological literacy in Fritjof Capra’s conception]. Tópicos en Educación Ambiental, 4, 7-18.

Pooley, J. & O’Connor, M. (2000). Environmental education and attitudes. Environment & Behavior, 32, 711-723.

Porter, M. & Kramer, M. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, December 2006. Retrieved from: Business%20Case%20for%20CSR.pdf

San Martín, H. (1983). Ecología humana y salud: El hombre y su ambiente [Human ecology and health: man and his environment]. Mexico City: Ediciones Científicas, La Prensa Médica Mexicana.

Schultz, P.W., C. Shriver, J.J. Tabanico, and A.M. Khazian. (2004). Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24, 31-42.

Tapia, C., Corral, V., Fraijo, B., & Durón, F. (2013). Assessing sustainable behavior and its correlates: a measure of pro-ecological, frugal, altruistic and equitable actions. Sustainability, 5, 711-723.

Tapia, C., Corral-Verdugo, V., Gutiérrez, C., Mireles, J., & Tirado, H. (2010). Emotions and proenvironmental behavior. In V. Corral-Verdugo, C. García, & M. Frías (Eds.), Psychological Approaches to Sustainability. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

Vining, J., & Ebreo, A. (2002). Emerging theoretical and methodological perspectives on conservation behavior. En R.B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology. New York: Wiley.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Victor Corral-Verdugo, Fernanda Inez García-Vazquez, Blanca Fraijo-Sing, Cesar Tapia-Fonllem

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The IJP maintain the highest standards of quality and have an acceptance rate that ranges between 30% to 45% which the American Psychological Association considers an acceptable rate and its revision times ranges from 3 months minimum to 7 month maximum waiting time. The IJP uses the open journal system for submissions, review, and promulgation of the work of the interamerican psychologists. It is indexed in: Redalyc, Pepsic, DOAJ, SCOPUS.

Dedicada a expandir preservar y divulgar la Psicología de las Américas desde el 1967.