This paper describes a phenomenological analysis whose goal is to learn the experience of death row inmates from their last statements. The sample is composed of 61 transcriptions from people executed by the U.S. state of Texas between 2011 and 2017, that were analyzed thematically. Among the main themes we found affection, religious belief, regret, acceptance, gratefulness and sense of closure. Most themes were of positive valence, which is coherent with previous research results. Because we used an experiential and descriptive method, the assessment of methodological integrity is uncomplicated.
Amnesty International (2018, March 21). The global view. Death sentences and executions 2007-2016. Retrieved from https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/death-penalty/. http://www.webcitation.org/6y52mtVKh
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality, Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Co., Inc.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. En H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57-71). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London: Sage.
Death Penalty Information Center (2018, March 21). Deterrence: States Without the Death Penalty Have Had Consistently Lower Murder Rates. Retrieved from https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/deterrence-states-without-death-penalty-have-had-consistently-lower-murder-rates. http://www.webcitation.org/6y52dEKzJ
Delgado, A. R. (2010). Metodología especial, métodos cualitativos y conceptos abstractos [Special methodology, qualitative methods and abstract concepts]. Psicothema, 22, 509-512.
Delgado, A.R. (2013). Why include phenomenological analysis in a Research Methods course? Psicothema, 25, 227-231. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2012.180
Delgado, A.R., & Prieto, G. (1997). Introducción a los métodos de investigación de la psicología. Madrid: Pirámide.
Foley, S. R., & Kelly, B. D. (2007). The psychological concomitants of capital punishment: Thematic analysis of last statements from death row. American Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 28, 7-14.
Giorgi, A. (2014). An affirmation of the phenomenological psychological descriptive method: A response to Rennie (2012). Psychological Methods, 19, 542-551. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000015
Giorgi, A., & Giorgi, B.M. (2003). The descriptive phenomenological psychological method. In P. M. Camic, J. E. Rodes, & L. Yardley (Eds.), Qualitative research in Psychology. Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 243–273). Washington, D. C: APA.
Gough, B., & Madill, A. (2012). Subjectivity in psychological science: from problem to prospect. Psychological Methods, 17, 374-384. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029313
Heflick, N. A. (2005). Sentenced to die: last statements and dying on death row. Omega, 51, 323-336. https://doi.org/10.2190/96X8-FLUT-TCLH-EL71
Kelly, B. D., & Foley, S. R. (2013). Love, spirituality, and regret: Thematic analysis of last statements from death row, Texas (2006-2011). The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 41, 540-550.
Levitt, H. M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J. W., Frost, D. M., Josselson, R., & Suárez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73, 26-46. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151
Lynch, M. (2015). Penal artifacts: mining documents to advance punishment and society theory. En J. Miller, & W. Palacios (eds.), Qualitative Research in Criminology (pp. 271-290). London, UK: Transaction Publishers.
Madill, A., & Gough, B. (2008). Qualitative research and its place in psychological science. Psychological Methods, 13, 254-271. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013220
Michell, J. (2004). The place of qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1, 307-309. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088704qp020oa
Pistrang, N. & Barker, C. (2012). Varieties of qualitative research: a pragmatic approach to selecting methods. En H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 5-18). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-001
Poortman, C.L., & Schildkamp, K. (2012). Alternative quality standards in qualitative research? Quality and Quantity, 46, 1727-1751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9555-5
Reicher, S. (2000). Against methodolatry. Some comments on Elliott, Fischer, and Rennie. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466500163031
Rennie, D. L. (2012). Qualitative research as methodical hermeneutics. Psychological Methods, 17, 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029250
Rice, S. K., Dirks, D., & Exline, J. J. (2009). Of guilt, defiance, and repentance: Evidence from the Texas death chamber. Justice Quarterly, 26, 295-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820802178063
Schuck, A. R. T., & , J. (2008). Dealing with the inevitable: Strategies of self-presentation and meaning construction in the final statements of inmates on texas death row. Discourse and Society, 19, 43-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507083687
Simon, J. (2000). The “society of captives” in the era of hyper-incarceration. Theoretical Criminology, 4, 285-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480600004003003
Texas Department of Criminal Justice. (2017). Victim survivors viewing executions: Frequently asked questions. Recuperado el 1 de marzo, 2018, de http://www.tdcj.texas.gov/faq/victim_viewing_execution.html
Wertz, F.J., Charmaz, K., McMullen, L.M., Josselson, R., Anderson R., & McSpadden E. (2011). Five ways of doing qualitative analysis: Phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry. New York: The Guilford Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2020 Ana R. Delgado