Friends with Benefits in Puerto Rican College Students

Randy Quiñones, Alfonso Martínez-Taboas, Jose Raúl Rodríguez-Gómez, José R. Pando

Abstract


A friend with benefits (FWB) relationship includes the presence of a friendship, sexual activity, and the absence of an established commitment. The main objective of this quantitative non-experimental investigation was to explore how different levels of religiosity and sensation seeking traits correlate among Puerto Rican university students that report FWB relationships. Three instruments were administered in the Spanish language to students from universities in the metropolitan area of Puerto Rico. According to their answers, 61.8% of the sample reported lifetime FWB relationships and 17.9% reported current FWB. Of the latter, 40% reported more than one lifetime FWB. Consistent with the stated hypothesis, we found that high levels of sensation seeking traits were associated to higher levels of reported FWB relationships (p<.05). The findings inform us about the motivations and expectations university students have to engage in FWB relationships.

Una relación de amigo o amiga con privilegio (ACP) tiene tres componentes; la presencia de una amistad, la actividad sexual y la ausencia de un compromiso establecido. El objetivo principal de esta investigación cuantitativa no experimental fue explorar como correlacionan distintos niveles de religiosidad y búsqueda de sensaciones en estudiantes puertorriqueños que reportan tener ACP. Se administraron tres cuestionarios en español a estudiantes de distintas universidades del área metropolitana de Puerto Rico. El 61.8% de la muestra reportó experiencias con ACP alguna vez en sus vidas y el 17.9% estaban en una relación de ACP al momento del estudio. De éstos, el 40% reportó tener más de un ACP. Consistente con las hipótesis planteadas, altos niveles de búsqueda de sensaciones estuvo asociado a un mayor número de relaciones de ACP (p< .05). Los resultados ayudan a informarnos sobre las motivaciones y expectativas de estudiantes universitarios que tienen ACP.  


Keywords


Friends with Benefits, Casual sex, Sexuality, Young adults

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bisson, M. & Levine, T. (2009). Negotiating a friend with benefits relationship. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 66-73.

Buss, D.M. (2003). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Claxton, S. E., & van Dulmen, M. H. M. (2013). Casual sexual relationships and experiences in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 138-150.

Ebstyne, P., & Roeser, R. W. (2009). Religion and spirituality in adolescent development. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (3rd. ed., pp. 435-478). New York: Wiley.

Epstein, M., Calzo, J.P., Smiler, A.P., & Ward, L.M. (2009). “Anything from making out to having sex”: Men’s negotiations of hooking up and friends with benefits scripts. Journal of Sex Research, 46(5), 414-424. DOI: 10.1080/00224490902775801.

Furman, W. & Shaffer, L. (2011). Romantic partners, friends, friends with benefits, and casual acquaintances as sexual partners. Journal of Sex Research, 48(6), 554-564.

Glenn, N., & Marquardt, E. (2001). Hooking up, hanging out, and hoping for Mr. Right: College women on dating and mating today. New York: Institute for American Values.

Hoyle, R. H., Fejfar, M. C., & Miller, J. D. (2000). Personality and sexual risk taking: A quantitative review. Journal of Personality, 68, 1203-1231.

Hughes, M., Morrison, K., & Asada, K.J. (2005). What’s love got to do with it? Exploring the impact of maintenance rules, love attitudes, and network support on friends with benefits relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 69(1), 49-66. DOI: 10.1080/10570310500034154

Kline, J.B. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Lehmiller, J.J., Vanderdrift, L.E. & Kelly, J.R. (2011). Sex differences in approaching friends with benefits relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 48(2/3), 275-284. Doi: 10.1080/00224491003721694

Levine, T.R. (November, 2007). Friends with benefits relationships not without troubles. In Quick Hits: Sex in the News, Contemporary Sexuality, 41(11), 7-8.

Messman, S. J., Canary, D. J., & Hause, K. S. (2000). Motives to remain platonic, equity, and the use of maintenance strategies in opposite-sex friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 67-94.

Mongeau, P.A., Knight, K., Williams, J., Eden. J., & Shaw, C. (2013). Identifying and explicating variation among friends with benefits relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 50(1), 37-47. Doi: 10.1080/00224499.2011.623797

Ortiz, A.P., Soto-Salgado, M., Suárez, E., Santos-Ortiz, M.C., Tortolero-Luna, G., & Pérez, C.M. (2011). Sexual behaviors among adults in Puerto Rico: A population-based study. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8, 2439-2449. Doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02329.x

Owen, J. & Fincham, F. (2011). Effects of gender and psychosocial factors on “friends with benefits” relationships among young adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(2), 311-320.

Owen, J., Fincham, F., & Manthos, M. (2013). Friendship after a friends with benefits relationship: Deception, psychological functioning, and social connectedness. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1443-1449.

Pando, J., Canino, G., Ramírez, R., Chávez, L., & Martínez-Taboas, A.

(2007). Prevalence and factors associated to sexual behavior in Puerto Rican adolescents. Puerto Rican Health Sciences Journal, 26, 355-366.

Paul, E. L., & Hayes, K. A. (2002). The casualties of ‘Casual’ sex: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students’ hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 639-661.

Pleck, J.H., Sonenstein, F.L. & Ku, L.C. (1993). Masculinity ideology: Its impact on adolescent males' heterosexual relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 49(3), 11-29.

Puentes, J., Knox, D. & Zusman, M.E. (2008). Participants in “friends with benefits” relationships. College Student Journal, 42(1), 176-180.

Regan, P. (2011). Close relationships. New York: Routledge.

Rodríguez-Benítez, R., Rodríguez-Gómez, J., & Sayers-Montalvo, S. (2010). Validation of a scale of attitudes towards sexuality in a sample of Puerto Rican elderly. Boletín de la Asociación Médica de Puerto Rico, 102(2), 15-23.

Smiler, A. P. (2008). "I wanted to get to know her better": Adolescent boys' dating motives, masculinity ideology, and sexual behavior. Journal of Adolescence, 31(1), 17-32. Abstract retrieved from ERIC database.

Tanner, J. L., & Arnett, J. J. (2011). Presenting emerging adulthood: What makes it developmentally distinctive? In J. J. Arnett, M. Kloep, L. B. Hendry & J. L. Tanner (Eds.), Debating emerging adulthood (pp. 13-30). New York: Oxford University Press.

Vanderdrift, L. E., Lehmiller, J. J., & Kelly, J. R. (2012). Commitment in friends with benefits relationships: Implications for relational and safe-sex outcomes. Personal Relationships, 19, 1-13.

Vélez-Pastrana, M.C., Ilarraza, T., Rivera, M., Bradley, G., Pérez, C., &

Pérez, F. (August, 2011). Sensation seeking, alcohol and substance abuse, reckless driving and sexual behavior: A cross cultural study of Puerto Rican and Australian adults. Poster presented at the American Psychological Association 119th Convention, Washington, DC.

Weaver, A. D., MacKeigan, K. L., & MacDonald, H. A. (2011). Experiences and perceptions of young adults in friends with benefits relationships: A qualitative study. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 20(1-2), 41-53.

Zuckerman, M. (2007). Sensation seeking and risky behavior.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Randy Quinones, Alfonso Martinez-Taboas, Jose Rafael Rodriguez-Gomez, Jose R. Pando

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The IJP maintain the highest standards of quality and have an acceptance rate that ranges between 30% to 45% which the American Psychological Association considers an acceptable rate and its revision times ranges from 3 months minimum to 7 month maximum waiting time. The IJP uses the open journal system for submissions, review, and promulgation of the work of the interamerican psychologists. It is indexed in: Redalyc, Pepsic, DOAJ, SCOPUS.

Dedicada a expandir preservar y divulgar la Psicología de las Américas desde el 1967.