Psychology, Interamerican
Bibliometric analysis of Latin American scientific journals of Psychology through the Scimago portal
Copyleft
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

Latin America
scientific journals
performance
coverage
Scopus
SCImago

How to Cite

Vizioli, N. A. (2024). Bibliometric analysis of Latin American scientific journals of Psychology through the Scimago portal. Revista Interamericana De Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 58(2), e1931. https://doi.org/10.30849/ripijp.v58i2.1931

Abstract

The preference for English as the language of scientific publications has resulted in a greater number of citations and a higher level of esteem for English-language scientific journals compared to those published in other languages. Consequently, researchers are frequently compelled to select a language other than their native tongue in which to disseminate their findings. This study sought to examine the extent and quality of coverage of Latin American psychology journals. A bibliometric analysis of scientific journals was conducted via the Scimago portal, with consideration given to the membership quartile based on the SJR indicator. It was determined that publications from Latin America account for 3.52% of the total coverage on Scopus (n=1336). The distribution of journals across the quartiles is as follows: 80.85% are located in quartile 4, while 19.15% are in quartile 3. A total of 85.11% of Latin American journals are open access. In the context of Latin America, Brazil is the country that exhibits the highest level of coverage and performance. In general, the results indicate that, although the coverage is less extensive than in other regions, the majority of Latin American publications are open access, facilitating rapid access to information.
https://doi.org/10.30849/ripijp.v58i2.1931
PDF (Español (España))

References

Aguado López, E., López López, W., Becerril, A., & Salas, G. (2018). Patrones de internacionalización en Psicología desde la Revista Interamericana de Psicología. Revista Interamericana De Psicología/InteramericanJournalofPsychology, 51(3). https://doi.org/10.30849/rip/ijp.v51i3.897

Amano, T., González-Varo, J. P., & Sutherland, W. J. (2016). Languages are still a major barrier to global science. PLoSBiology, 14(12), e2000933. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2000933

Arnett, J. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63(7), 602–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.602

Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019

Baneyx A. (2008). "Publish or Perish" as citation metrics used to analyze scientific output in the humanities: International case studies in economics, geography, social sciences, philosophy, and history. ArchivumImmunologiae et TherapiaeExperimentalis, 56(6), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00005-008-0043-0

Buela-Casal, G., &Zych, I. (2012). What do the scientists think about the impact factor?Scientometrics, 92(2), 281-292.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0676-y

Bunge, M. (2018). La ciencia: su método y su filosofía (Vol. 1). Laetoli.

Caputo, A., &Kargina, M. (2022). A user-friendly method to mergeScopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 10(1), 82-88.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-021-00142-7

Cheon, B. K., Melani, I., & Hong, Y.-y. (2020). How USA-centric is psychology? An archival study of implicit assumptions of generalizability of findings to human nature based on origins of study samples. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(7), 928–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620927269

Collazo-Reyes, F., Luna-Morales, M. E., & Luna-Morales, E. (2017). Change in the publishing regime in Latin America: from a local to universal journalArchivos de InvestigaciónMédica/Archives of Medical Research (1970–2014). Scientometrics, 110, 695-709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2207-8

De Rond, M., & Miller, A. N. (2005). Publish or perish: Bane or boon of academic life?Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(4), 321-329.

do Canto, F. L., Pinto, A. L., Gavron, E. M., &Talau, M. (2022). Latin American and Caribbean journals indexed in Google Scholar Metrics. Scientometrics, 127(2), 763-783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04237-x

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Echchakoui, S. (2020). Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: the case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 8, 165-184.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-020-00081-9

Gallegos, M., Berra, M., Benito, E., & López López, W. (2014). Las nuevas dinámicas del conocimiento científico y su impacto en la Psicología Latinoamericana. Psicoperspectivas, 13(3), 106-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-Vol13-Issue3-fulltext-377

Gallegos, M., Pérez-Acosta, A. M., Klappenbach, H., LópezLópez, W., &Bregman, C. (2020). The Bibliometric Studies in the Field of Ibero-American Psychology: A Metabibliometric Review. Interdisciplinaria, 37(2), 95-115.http://dx.doi.org/10.16888/interd.2020.37.2.6

Gálvez-Contreras, A. Y., Guzmán-Muñiz, J., Moy-López, N. A., & González-Pérez, O. (2022). ContributionsofLatinAmericatoscientificregsearch in neuroscience and psychology. Revista Mexicana de Neurociencia, 23(2), 44-50. https://doi.org/10.24875/rmn.21000034

Giovannetti, F., Cevasco, J., & Acosta Buralli, K. (2022). Psychological science in Argentina: current state & future directions. Discover Psychology, 2(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-022-00033-7

González-Pereira, B., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2010). A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 379-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.002

Gordin, M. D. (2015). Scientific Babel: How Science Was Done Before and After Global English. University of Chicago Press.

Gutiérrez, G., &Landeira-Fernández, J. (2018). Psychological Research in Latin America: Current and Future Perspectives. En R. Ardila (Ed.),Psychology in Latin America: Current Status, Challenges and Perspectives (pp. 7-26). Springer.

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., &Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X

Kwasnicka, D., Ten Hoor, G. A., van Dongen, A., Gruszczyńska, E., Hagger, M. S., Hamilton, K., Hankonen, N., Heino, M. T. J., Kotzur, M., Noone, C., Rothman, A. J., Toomey, E., Warner, L. M., Kok, G., Peters, G. J., &Luszczynska, A. (2021). Promoting scientific integrity through open science in health psychology: results of the Synergy Expert Meeting of the European Health Psychology Society. Health Psychology Review, 15(3), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2020.1844037

Mahdjoub, H., Maas, B., Nuñez, M. A., &Khelifa, R. (2022). Recommendations for making editorial boards diverse and inclusive. Trends in Ecology&Evolution, 37(12), 1021-1024.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2022.09.011

Marín Velásquez, T., &Arriojas Tocuyo, D. D. J. (2021). Ubicación de revistas científicas en cuartiles según SJR: Predicción a partir de estadística multivariante. Anales de Documentación, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.6018/analesdoc.455951

Millán, J. D., Polanco, F., Ossa, J. C., Béria, J. S., &Cudina, J. N. (2017). La cienciometría, su método y su filosofía: Reflexiones epistémicas de sus alcances en el siglo XXI. Revista Guillermo de Ockham, 15(2), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.21500/22563202.3492

Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 213-228.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5

Montero, I., & León, O. G. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in Psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7(3), 847-862.

Muthukrishna, M., Bell, A. V., Henrich, J., Curtin, C. M., Gedranovich, A., McInerney, J., &Thue, B. (2020). Beyond western, educated, industrial, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) psychology: Measuring and mapping scales of cultural and psychological distance. Psychological Science, 31(6), 678–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620916782

Neimann Rasmussen, L., & Montgomery, P. (2018). The prevalence of and factors associated with inclusion of non-English language studies in Campbell systematic reviews: a survey and meta-epidemiological study. Systematic Reviews, 7(1), 129. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0786-6

Núñez, M. A., & Amano, T. (2021). Monolingual searches can limit and bias results in global literature reviews. Nature Ecology &Evolution, 5(3), 264. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01369-w

Núñez, M. A., Barlow, J., Cadotte, M., Lucas, K., Newton, E., Pettorelli, N., & Stephens, P. A. (2019). Assessing the uneven global distribution of readership, submissions and publications in´++

applied ecology: Obvious problems without obvious solutions. Journal of Applied Ecology, 56(1), 4-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13319

Orbay, K., Miranda, R., &Orbay, M. (2020). Invited article: Building journal impact factor quartile into the assessment of academic performance: A case study. ParticipatoryEducational Research, 7(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.20.26.7.2

Polanco, F. A., Mencía-Ripley, A., Morgan, M. L., Polanco-Carrasco, R., Lopes Miranda, R., & Tau, R. (2020). Welcome to the new RevistaInteramericana de Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology. Revista Interamericana De Psicología/InteramericanJournalofPsychology, 54(1), e1302. https://doi.org/10.30849/ripijp.v54i1.1302

Pontika, N. (2015). Open Access: what's in it for me as an early career researcher?Journal of Science Communication, 14(4), C04.https://doi.org/10.22323/2.14040304

Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1), 12.https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012

Ramírez-Castañeda V. (2020). Disadvantages in preparing and publishing scientific papers caused by the dominance of the English language in science: The case of Colombian researchers in biological sciences. PloSOne, 15(9), e0238372. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238372

Roldán-Valadez, E., Salazar-Ruiz, S. Y., Ibarra-Contreras, R., &Ríos, C. (2019). Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, Scimago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics. Irish Journal of Medical Science, 188(3), 939–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-018-1936-5

Schotten, M., Meester, W. J., Steiginga, S., & Ross, C. A. (2017). A brief history of Scopus: The world’s largest abstract and citation database of scientific literature. EnCantu-Ortiz, F.J. Research analytics (pp. 31-58). Auerbach Publications.

Scimago, (s/f). SJR — Scimago Journal & Country Rank [Portal]. http://www.scimagojr.com

Sivertsen, G. (2016). Patterns of internationalization and criteria for research assessment in the social sciences and humanities. Scientometrics, 107, 357-368.

Thalmayer, A. G., Toscanelli, C., & Arnett, J. J. (2021). The neglected 95% revisited: Is American psychology becoming less American? American Psychologist, 76(1), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000622

Tindle, R. (2021). Improving the global reach of psychological research. DiscoverPsychology, 1, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-021-00004-4

Torres Rivera, E. (2017). 50 Años de conciencia y experiencia: Un breve recuento de la Revista Interamericana de Psicología. Revista Interamericana de Psicología/InteramericanJournalofPsychology, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.30849/rip/ijp.v51i1.498

VandenBos, G. R., & Winkler, J. M. (2015). An analysis of the status of journals and research in psychology from Latin America. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 28(Suppl 1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7153.20152840012

Vera-Baceta, M. A., Thelwall, M., &Kousha, K. (2019). Web of Science and Scopus language coverage. Scientometrics, 121(3), 1803-1813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03264-z

Visca, J., Gallegos, M., López, W. L., Polanco, R., &Cervigni, M. (2018). Las publicaciones periódicas de psicología en Argentina: Revisión histórica y situación actual. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica, 27(3), 478–491. http://doi.org/10.24205/03276716.2018.1076

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Nicolás Alejandro Vizioli