Psychology, Interamerican
Hacia un modelo universal de los intereses
PDF (Español (España))


intereses vocacionales
análisis factorial
desarrollo humano
teorías del desarrollo
inventarios de personalidad
estructura de los intereses
vocational interests
personality inventories

How to Cite

Cirino Gerena, G., & Ortiz Labiosa, L. M. (2019). Hacia un modelo universal de los intereses. Revista Interamericana De Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 53(1), 8–16.


Los modelos de la estructura de los intereses basados en análisis factoriales no han resultado satisfactorios.  Varios modelos postulan las dimensiones de personas, cosas, datos e ideas, basados en la teoría de Roe, pero dicha teoría no ha recibido suficiente apoyo empírico.  Usamos la teoría del autor que sugiere las mismas dimensiones que Roe y ha tenido apoyo empírico, por lo que es una mejor base para un modelo de intereses.  El autor sugiere que los intereses son conceptos sobre actividades, los cuales surgen en la niñez como parte del desarrollo cognitivo.  Además, sugiere que estos conceptos pudieran ser universales, dado a que hacen referencia a aspectos de la realidad.

PDF (Español (España))


Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological

interpretation. New York: Holt.

Alvarado Cartagena, I. & Acevedo Márquez, R. (1999). Desarrollo y Consejería Ocupacional. San Juan, PR: Prime Printing.

Case, R. (1992). Neo-Piagetian theories of child development. En R. J. Sternberg & C. A. Berg (Eds.), Intellectual development (pp. 161-196). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Cimpian, A. & Park, J. J. (2014). Tell me about pangolins! Evidence that children are motivated to learn about kinds. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General, 143(1), 46-55.

Autor. (año 1). Título del artículo. Revista donde se publicó, volumen, páginas.

Autor. (Ed.). (año 2). Título. Lugar donde se publicó.

Autor. (año 3). Título. Lugar donde se publicó.

Autor. (año 4). Título. Lugar donde se publicó.

D’Costa, A. & Winefordner, D. (1969). A cubistic model of vocational interests. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 17(4), 242-249.

Deci, E .L. & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-269.

Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299.

Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34.

Herrans Pérez, L. (1985). Psicología y Medición: El desarrollo de pruebas psicológicas en Puerto Rico. México: Editorial Limusa.

Holland, J. L. (1992). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (2nd Ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Lapan, R. T., Mc Grawth, E. & Kaplan, D. (1990). Factor structure of the basic interest scales by gender across time. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 216-222.

Maldonado-Feliciano, L. E. & Rivera-Alicea, B. E. (2002). Vocational interests and vocational satisfaction of licensed psychologists in Puerto Rico. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 36, 191-213.

Mandler, J. M. (2007). On the origin of the conceptual system. American Psychologist, 62, 741-751.

McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. (1985). Updating Norman’s adequate taxonomy: Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 710-721.

Namy, L. L., and Gentner, D. (2002). Making a silk purse out of two sow’s ears- Young children’s use of comparison in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 5-15.

Prediger, D. J. (1976). A world-of-work map for career exploration. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 24, 198-208.

Prediger, D. J. (1982). Dimensions underlying Holland’s Hexagon: Missing link between interests and occupations? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 21, 259-287.

Rodríguez, G. & Matos, S. (1999). Título del artículo. Lugar donde se publicó.

Roe, A. (1954). A new classification of occupations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1, 215-220.

Roe, A. (1957). Early determinants of vocational choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 4, 212-217.

Roe, A. & Siegelman, M. (1964). The origin of interests. APGA Inquiry Studies-Number One. Washington, DC: American Personnel and Guidance Association.

Rogers, T. T. & Patterson, K. (2007). Object categorization: Reversals and explanations of basic level advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General, 136, 451-469.

Rosch, E., Mervis , C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem , P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439. ~msl/courses/2223/Readings/Rosch-CogPsych1976.pdf

Rounds, J. (1995). Vocational interests: Evaluating structural hypotheses. En D. Lubinski & L. G. Humphreys (Eds.), Assessing individual differences in human behavior (pp. 177-232). Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black publishing.

Rounds, J. & Day, S. X. (1999). Describing, evaluating, and creating vocational interest structures. En M. L. Savickas & A. R. Spokane (Eds.), Meaning, measurement, and counseling use of vocational interests (pp. 103-133). Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black Publishing.

Tracey, J. G. (2001). The development of structure of interests in children: Setting the stage. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 89-104.

Tyler, L. E. (1955). The development of vocational interests: The organization of likes and dislikes in ten-years-old children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 86, 33-44.

Zbaracki, J. V., Clark, S. G., & Wolins, L. (1985). Children’s interest inventory, grades 4-6. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 517-521.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).