Psychology, Interamerican
Reference groups and stereotype perception in Colombia


social perception

How to Cite

Barbosa, S., Jiménez-Leal, W., & Cortes, C. E. (2018). Reference groups and stereotype perception in Colombia. Revista Interamericana De Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 52(1).


The objective of this study is to understand the categorization of social groups in Colombia, as well as exploring possible in-group favoritism.  The theoretical framework used is the Stereotype Content Model (SCM), according to which warmth and competence are universal principles that guide social cognition. The study was conducted in two phases. First, a diverse sample of 88 people identified the most relevant groups in Colombian society, which resulted in a list of 16 groups. Second, 210 people rated these groups in dimensions including warmth, competence, status and emotions associated. Results show idiosyncratic particularities of Colombian society, including failure to predict warmth from emotion ratings. These findings highlight difficulties in social group perception in Colombia as well as slight adjustments required for the SCM.



Appelbaum, N. P. (2003). Muddied waters : race, region, and local history in Colombia, 1846-1948. Durham: Duke University Press.

Asbrock, F. (2010). Stereotypes of Social Groups in Germany in Terms of Warmth and Competence. ZSP Social Psychology, 41(2), 76-81.

Bergsieker, H. B., Leslie, L. M., Constantine, V. S., & Fiske, S. T. (2012). Stereotyping by omission: eliminate the negative, accentuate the positive. Journal of personality and social psychology, 102(6), 1214-1238.

Caprariello, P., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Fiske, S. (2009). Social Structure Shapes Cultural Stereotypes and Emotions: A Causal Test of the Stereotype Content Model. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12(2), 147-155.

Cikara, M., & Fiske, S. (2012). Stereotypes and Schadenfreude : behavioral and neural markers of pleasure at another's misfortune. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 8.

Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2004). When Professionals Become Mothers, Warmth Doesn't Cut the Ice. Journal of Social Issues, 60(4), 701-718.

Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of personality and social psychology, 92(4), 631-648.

Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., Kwan, V. S. Y., Glick, P., Demoulin, S., Leyens, J.-P., . . . Ziegler, R. (2009). Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. BJSO British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(1), 1-33.

Dovidio, J. F., Hewstone, M., Glick, P., & Esses, V. M. (2010). Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination: Theoretical and Empirical Overview. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. M. Esses (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination (pp. 3-29). London: Sage Publications.

Durante, F., Capozza, D., & Fiske, S. (2010). The stereotype content model: The role played by competence in inferring group status. TPM Test. Psychom. Methodol. Appl. Psychol. TPM - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 17(4), 187-199.

Durante, F., Fiske, S. T., Kervyn, N., Cuddy, A. J. C., Akande, A., Adetoun, B. E., . . . Storari, C. C. (2013). Nations' income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: How societies mind the gap. BJSO British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(4), 726-746.

Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of personality and social psychology, 82(6), 878-902.

Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends in cognitive sciences, 11(2), 77-83.

Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Abrams, D., Dardenne, B., Ferreira, M. C., Gonzalez, R., . . . Yzerbyt, V. (2006). Anti-American Sentiment and America's Perceived Intent to Dominate: An 11-Nation Study. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28(4), 363-373.

Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo. POPS Political Psychology, 25(6), 881-919.

Kervyn, N., Fiske, S. T., & Malone, C. (2012). Brands as intentional agents framework: How perceived intentions and ability can map brand perception. Journal of Consumer Psychology Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(2), 166-176.

López-Rodríguez, L., Cuadrado, I., & Navas, M. (2013). Aplicación extendida del Modelo del Contenido de los Estereotipos (MCE) hacia tres grupos de inmigrantes en España. Extended application of the Stereotype Content Model (SCM) towards three immigrant groups in Spain. Estudios de Psicología, 34(2), 197-208. doi: 10.1174/021093913806751375

Saiz, J. L., Merino, M. E., & Quilaqueo, D. (2009). Meta-estereotipos sobre los indígenas mapuches de chile. Interdisciplinaria Interdisciplinaria, 26(1), 23-48.

World Development Indicators. (2013). Retrieved 18 March, 2015, from

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).